Legal Opinion

Pippin v. Burnum

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 8, 1984No. 68502, 68538PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMurray, Chief Judge.

This is an action on an oral contract to combine (harvest) wheat. At trial plaintiff testified that after negotiations with defendant they agreed that plaintiff (at that time in the business of custom combining and custom harvesting) was to harvest defendant’s wheat crop for $23 per acre (defendant to be responsible for transporting the harvested grain from defendant’s fields). Plaintiff testified that pursuant to this agreement he transported his equipment to and combined the *554wheat upon fields designated by defendant’s foreman.

Plaintiff testified that he determined the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Harper v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  2. Studebaker Corporation v. NailCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  4. Development Corp. v. BerndtCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  5. Smith v. LottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Al and Zack Brown, Inc. v. BullockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  2. Chavers v. Kent Diversified Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API