Harper v. Hall

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

Since the evidence amply authorizes the verdict, the general grounds of the motion for new trial are without merit, and the first headnote requires no further amplification.

Special grounds 4, 5, and 6 of the amended motion for new trial state the contentions of the defendant, that certain excerpts taken from the charge were unauthorized by the evidence, and that the giving of the same in charge was harmful to the defendant and error. The jury was authorized by the evidence to draw the inference from the sworn testimony that the truck was not equipped with…