Legal Opinion

McConiga v. Riches

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 7, 1985No. 6319-4-IIIPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.

Ross and Jennifer Lay appeal an order on summary judgment providing that only respondents Addianna McConiga, Charles and Betty King, Steven and Christina Bradley, Albert and Linda Bailey, Theodore Wilkins, Ray and Sherry Carr and David Neikirk have the right to use Highland Square Road. The Lays contend the court erred when it: (1) did not decide who had the right to use the east leg of the road; (2) held there was no implied dedication of the road; (3) determined respondents hold fee title in the road; and (4) determined the easement was exclusive. We affirm.

John and Leona Riches,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Spokane & Inland Empire RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. White v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  3. MacCorkle v. City of CharlestonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Wood v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Hagen v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Roeder Co. v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Mall, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Haggart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  4. Town of Moorcroft v. LangWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Busenius v. HoranCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API