Legal Opinion

MacCorkle v. City of Charleston

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1928No. 6049PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HatcheR, Judge:

The plaintiff herein appeals from a decree dissolving a temporary injunction restraining the city from paving an alley abutting on his property, and dismissing the bill.

By a deed dated 1884, the heirs of Wm. Goshorn, Sr., partitioned their property on the corner of State 'and Summers Streets in the City of Charleston into seven lots, with the alley in question running from State Street between the lots to the opposite property line. A map was recorded with the deed on which the alley is designated “Alley 12 ft. Wide”. Plaintiff is now the record owner of Lots Nos. 1 and 7.

v The…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Speir v. . Town of New UtrechtNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Shellhouse v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Cook v. TottenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Paul v. CarverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Town of Paden City v. FeltonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Los Angeles City High School District v. SwensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. City of Staunton v. Augusta Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1937
  4. Town of Moorcroft v. LangWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Anderson v. Town of HemingwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API