Legal Opinion

Walker v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 4, 1946No. 45869PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHALEY, Chief Justice.

The plaintiffs are silk merchants and brokers. On March 13, 1942, they owned, and had continuously owned on and from July 25, 1941, certain bales of raw silk, warehoused by the United States Testing Co., Inc., at Hoboken, New Jersey.

One hundred of these bales are involved in this controversy, with a total “conditioned weight plus 2%” (as it is called) of 13,610.10 pounds, all imported from Japan. They were requisitioned by the Government March 13, 1942, under the act of October 16, 1941, 55 Stat. 742, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, §§ 721-724. The plaintiffs were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Brooks-Scanlon Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. United States v. New River Collieries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Luckenbach Steamship Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Speed v. Transamerica CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1955
  2. Hartford National Bank & Trust Co. v. E. F. Drew & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1960
  3. Edward P. Stahel & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
  4. Arkansas Valley Ry., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946
  5. Seven-Up Bottling Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API