Legal Opinion
Amro v. Boeing Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided January 7, 1997No. Civil Action 96-2147-KHVPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Joseph P. Amro, a senior engineer currently employed by The Boeing Company, brings suit for national origin discrimination in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., disability discrimination in violation of the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12117, and retaliation in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. 1 The matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. #68) filed November 8, 1996. For the following reasons, the Court finds that said motion…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Amro v. Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Praseuth v. Newell-Rubbermaid, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- Glover v. Heart of America Management Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999
- Shinwari v. Raytheon Aircraft Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- Caruthers v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.