Legal Opinion
J-F-F
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2006No. ID 3532PublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
23 I&N Dec. 912
(A.G. 2006) Interim Decision #3532 In re J-F-F-, Respondent Decided by Attorney General May 1, 2006 U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Attorney General An alien’s eligibility for deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture cannot be established by stringing together a series of suppositions to show that it is more likely than not that torture will result where the evidence does not establish that each step in the hypothetical chain of events is more likely than not to happen. FOR RESPONDENT: Pro se FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY: Tara…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DohertySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Navaratwam Kamalthas v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Ukashu Nuru, AKA Ukasha Nuru v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Emmanuel Senyo Agyeman v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Y-LBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- W-G-RBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2014
- H-L-H- & Z-Y-ZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2010
- M-A-MBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2011
- A-S-BBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2008
- CASTRO-TUMBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2018
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.