Legal Opinion
CASTRO-TUM
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2018No. ID 3926PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
27 I&N Dec. 271
(A.G. 2018) Interim Decision #3926 Matter of CASTRO-TUM, Respondent Decided by Attorney General May 17, 2018 U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Attorney General (1) Immigration judges and the Board do not have the general authority to suspend indefinitely immigration proceedings by administrative closure. To the extent the Board’s decisions in Matter of Avetisyan,
25 I&N Dec. 688
(BIA 2012), and Matter of W-Y-U-,
27 I&N Dec. 17
(BIA 2017), are inconsistent with this conclusion, those decisions are overruled. (2) Immigration judges and the Board may only…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- A-BBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2018
- BERMUDEZ-COTABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2018
- Wendy Osorio Martinez v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- L-A-B-RBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2018
- Jesus Zuniga Romero v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.