W-G-R
Board of Immigration Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
26 I&N Dec. 208
(BIA 2014) Interim Decision #3794 Matter of W-G-R-, Respondent Decided February 7, 2014 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) In order to clarify that the “social visibility” element required to establish a cognizable “particular social group” does not mean literal or “ocular” visibility, that element is renamed as “social distinction.” Matter of E-A-G-,
24 I&N Dec. 591
(BIA 2008); Matter of S-E-G-,
24 I&N Dec. 579
(BIA 2008); Matter of A-M-E- & J-G-U-,
24 I&N Dec. 69
(BIA 2007); and Matter of C-A-,
23 I&N Dec. 951
(BI…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Aguirre-AguirreSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- ACOSTABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1985
- M-E-V-GBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2014
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by193 opinions
- M-E-V-GBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2014
- Wilfredo Reyes v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- A-BBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2018
- Oliverto Pirir-Boc v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Antonio A. Gonzalez v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
188 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.