Legal Opinion

M-A-M

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 2011No. ID 3711PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

25 I&N Dec. 474

(BIA 2011) Interim Decision #3711 Matter of M-A-M-, Respondent Decided May 4, 2011 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) Aliens in immigration proceedings are presumed to be competent and, if there are no indicia of incompetency in a case, no further inquiry regarding competency is required. (2) The test for determining whether an alien is competent to participate in immigration proceedings is whether he or she has a rational and factual understanding of the nature and object of the proceedings, can consult…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Shaughnessy v. United States Ex Rel. MezeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Landon v. PlasenciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Indiana v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Jordany Pierre-Paul v. William Barr, U. S. Atty GeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  2. CASTRO-TUMBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2018
  3. Bistermu Mora Salgado v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Edwin Campos Mejia v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. Henri Calderon-Rodriguez v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API