T. H. Rogers Lumber Co. v. M. W. Judd Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Oklahoma County; John W. Hayson, Judge. Action by the M. W. Judd Lumber Company against the T. H. Rogers Lumber Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion, by
WATTS, C.
Defendant in error sued the plaintiff in error in the county court of -Oklahoma county. Parties will be referred to as they appeared below. After plaintiff’s evidence defendant interposed a demurrer, which was denied, and after defendant’s evidence, plain tiff demurred, which demurrer was sustained, and judgment rendered accordingly for the plaintiff. Motion for new trial was denied, and defendant appealed, assigning error: (1) In overruling the demurrer to the plaintiff’s evidence; (2) in sustaining plaintiff’s demurrer to defendant’s evidence; (3) in rendering judgment…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Reed v. . RandallNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Underwood v. WolfIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Scott v. Vulcan Iron Works Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Woolsey v. ZieglarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- English v. Spokane Com. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1893
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rawlings v. UferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Taylor v. Enid National BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Goar v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Versatile Helicopters, Inc. v. City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Martin v. CooganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.