Legal Opinion

Woolsey v. Zieglar

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 9, 1912No. 1807PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error from Kay County Court; Claude Duval, Judge. Action by H. M. Zieglar against A. B. Woolsey. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHARP, C.

Plaintiff sued defendant for damages growing out of an alleged breach of warranty in the purchase of a milch cow. The contract of sale was verbal. The testimony of the plaintiff tended to show that he had advertised in a newspaper for a first-class milch cow; that the defendant represented he had such a cow as the plaintiff wanted, claiming that his cow was a first-class No. 1 Jersey; that the plaintiff went out to defendant’s farm and saw the cow, and that she looked to be a first-class cow, and that plaintiff at the time remarked that she ought to be milked, but was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Solts v. Southwestern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Fairbank Canning Co. v. . MetzgerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Moore v. First Nat. Bank of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Kenner v. HardingIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Smith v. BordenIndiana Supreme Court · 1903

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Model LaundrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Rison v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Maly v. LamertonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Frey v. FailesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Earley v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API