Legal Opinion

Farnsworth v. Burdick

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 1915No. 19,136PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Allen district court; Oscar Foust, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

This is an action to recover on a promissory note. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff. The defendants appeal.

The defendants, Wm. S. Burdick and A. M. Ewing, in consideration for a tract of land in Mercer county, Missouri, gave a stock of goods in Iola, Kan., a negotiable promissory note for the sum of $500, signed by all the defendants, and assumed an encumbrance on the land for the sum of $890. The trade was made with, and the note given to, J. A. Wheeler, who negotiated the note to the plaintiff by writing on the back…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCrum v. CorbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  2. Hatch v. BarrettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  3. Hadden v. RodkeySupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  4. Briggs v. LathamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Leach v. UrschelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. Mangold & Glandt Bank v. UtterbackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Prichard v. StrikeUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Fay v. WitteNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Rawlins County State Bank v. RummelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API