Farnsworth v. Burdick
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Allen district court; Oscar Foust, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Marshall, J.:
This is an action to recover on a promissory note. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff. The defendants appeal.
The defendants, Wm. S. Burdick and A. M. Ewing, in consideration for a tract of land in Mercer county, Missouri, gave a stock of goods in Iola, Kan., a negotiable promissory note for the sum of $500, signed by all the defendants, and assumed an encumbrance on the land for the sum of $890. The trade was made with, and the note given to, J. A. Wheeler, who negotiated the note to the plaintiff by writing on the back…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McCrum v. CorbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- Hatch v. BarrettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Hadden v. RodkeySupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Briggs v. LathamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
3Cited by13 opinions
- Leach v. UrschelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Mangold & Glandt Bank v. UtterbackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Prichard v. StrikeUtah Supreme Court · 1926
- Fay v. WitteNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Rawlins County State Bank v. RummelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.