Legal Opinion

Rawlins County State Bank v. Rummel

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 10, 1923No. 24,537PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

This is an action by the plaintiff, the purchaser of a promissory note given to the Kansas Auto Sales Company, signed by Matt C. Rummel, and transferred to the plaintiff. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff against the Kansas Auto Sales Company by default and against Matt C. Rummel on answers to special questions by the jury, which returned a general verdict in favor of Matt C. Rummel, who appeals.

The defense to the note was that it had been obtained by the payee, the Kansas Auto Sales Company, by fraud and that the plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kellogg v. Douglas County BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  2. Farnsworth v. BurdickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. E. D. Fisher Lumber & Coal Co. v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Adolph Ramish, Inc. v. WoodruffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. SymmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. International Harvester Co. of America v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. Hoosier Mutual Insurance v. Citizens Trust & Savings BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Merchants & Mechanics Savings Bank v. HaddixWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API