Legal Opinion

Oaks v. King

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided November 14, 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoven, J.

In this summary process action, stipulations by the parties established the plaintiff-landlord’s prima facie case for possession. The case proceeded to trial on the defendant-tenants’ claim that they were entitled to withhold rent under G.L.c. 239, §8A because an unremediated mold condition on the premises constituted a breach of the implied warranty of habitability. The tenants also counterclaimed for breach of the warranty of habitability as well as a breach of their right to quiet enjoyment, breach of the lease agreement, and G.L.c. 93A violations. At the close of the tenants’ case, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Poirier v. Town of PlymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. McKenna v. BeginMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
  3. Cameron v. CarelliMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
  4. Devito v. Cellular Mobile Communications, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1993
  5. Sugarman v. MalkemusMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shade v. Athena Equipment & Supply, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010
  2. Sapienza-Cote v. Carabetta Management Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2009
  3. McKeown v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API