Oaks v. King
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtCoven, J.
In this summary process action, stipulations by the parties established the plaintiff-landlord’s prima facie case for possession. The case proceeded to trial on the defendant-tenants’ claim that they were entitled to withhold rent under G.L.c. 239, §8A because an unremediated mold condition on the premises constituted a breach of the implied warranty of habitability. The tenants also counterclaimed for breach of the warranty of habitability as well as a breach of their right to quiet enjoyment, breach of the lease agreement, and G.L.c. 93A violations. At the close of the tenants’ case, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Poirier v. Town of PlymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- McKenna v. BeginMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
- Cameron v. CarelliMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
- Devito v. Cellular Mobile Communications, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1993
- Sugarman v. MalkemusMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shade v. Athena Equipment & Supply, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010
- Sapienza-Cote v. Carabetta Management Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2009
- McKeown v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008