Legal Opinion

Sapienza-Cote v. Carabetta Management Co.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided March 2, 2009PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrant, J.

This case illustrates why very few people mourn the repeal of former Mass. R. Civ. P., Rule 64A, which required district court judges to respond to requests for rulings of law filed by litigants in civil cases. Today, the problem described in this opinion would not exist because the judge would be required to issue written findings. Mass. R. Civ. R, Rule 52(c).

Theresa Sapienza-Cote (“Sapienza-Cote”) signed a one-year lease for an apartment in a building in Wakefield owned by Colonial Point Phase I Realty Company (“Colonial”) and managed by Carabetta Management Company (“Carabetta”) with the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jablonski v. CaseyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  2. Provenzano v. Plymouth Rock Assurance Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008
  3. Keystone Montessori School, Inc. v. MaloneyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008
  4. Mercier v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
  5. Rader v. OdermattMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis, Malm & D'Agostine v. LahnstonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
  2. Kendall v. CuddMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API