Legal Opinion
Sugarman v. Malkemus
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided May 14, 1997PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCoven, J.
This is an action for breach of contract to recover payment for psychiatric services. The trial judge refused to allow testimony concerning forensic psychiatric services provided by the plaintiff in connection with the defendant’s divorce proceedings in the Probate and Family Court Department, and entered judgment for the defendant at the close of the plaintiff’s case. Pursuant to Dist./ Mun. Cts. R. A D. A, Rule 8C, the plaintiff now appeals the trial judge’s eviden-tiary rulings, refusal to permit the plaintiff to amend his complaint, and entry of judgment for the defendant
The plaintiff…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Castellucci v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Charbonnier v. AmicoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Goulet v. Whitin MacHine Works, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Mathis v. Massachusetts Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Hall v. Horizon House Microwave, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Prophete v. PolyniceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
- Parks v. RicciardiMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2005
- Hussain v. Cameron Construction & Roofing Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2007
- Oaks v. KingMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2007
- Smith v. WrightMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.