Hanna v. Stoll
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
It is contended that errors, prejudicial to the defendant, occurred upon the trial of the case, which may be summarized as follows:(1) Rejection of certain ordinances of the city of Lakewood offered in evidence by the defendant. (2) Error of subsequent application and qualification of written instruction given before argument at the defendant’s request. (3) Refusal to give instruction requested by defendant before argument. (4) (riving plaintiff’s requested instruction relative to “loss of earning power.” (5) Errors in the general charge in several respects to be noted later.
The ordinances in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schell v. DuBoisOhio Supreme Court · 1916
- Bradley v. Cleveland Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1925
- McKenna v. Citizens' Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Britton v. Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by31 opinions
- Brandy Andler v. Clear Channel Broadcasting, IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- City of Fairbanks v. NesbettAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
- Berge v. Columbus Community Cable AccessOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- Knisely v. Community Traction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
- Drayton Ex Rel. Drayton v. Jiffee Chemical Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1975
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.