Britton v. Street Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent. (Grove, J.) Negligence case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, C. J.
This is an action for negligent injury. The jury found in favor of the defendant.
There were but two witnesses to the accident or injury. The plaintiff testified substantially that late in the afternoon of November 8, 1887, he took a car belonging to defendant on Division street, going south, at or near Oakes street, in the city of Grand Eapids, on his way home, intending to get off at Pleasant street. The car was drawn by two horses, and was what is called a “closed” or “bob-tailed” car, where passengers can only get off and on at the rear platform. There was no conductor, the fare being paid…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Hanna v. StollOhio Supreme Court · 1925
- Williams v. Mount Hood Ry. & Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1910
- Anderson v. Citizens' Street RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Pierce v. C. H. Bidwell Thresher Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Tuttle v. Detroit, Jackson & Chicago Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.