Legal Opinion

Knisely v. Community Traction Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1932No. 23048PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.

There are four assignments of error which we shall notice. The first assignment in logical order of discussion is that growing out of the application by the Court of Appeals of the so-called two issue rule, which had its origin in the case of Sites v. Haverstick, 23 Ohio St., 626. This rule has been so often stated by this court that it is unnecessary to restate it in this discussion. The Court of Appeals declared the rule to be applicable where the two issues related to the negligence of the defendant and the con- tributary negligence of the plaintiff. The verdict of the jury was general,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hanna v. StollOhio Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Orr v. CrowderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Colonial Stores, Inc. v. ScarbroughSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  3. Swoboda v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Bush v. Harvey Transfer Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Mungin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API