Ashfield v. Case
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
' Appeal by the plaintiffs, J. Howard Ashfield and another, from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York borough of Brooklyn, in favor of the defendant, entered on the 28th day of January, 1904.
1Opinion of the Court
Jenks, J.:
The action is for brokers’ commissions for services in procuring a loan upon real estate. The parties agreed upon the facts. The *453defendant trustee authorized the plaintiffs to procure the loan and promised' to pay $100 commission therefor. The plaintiffs were the efficient cause of procuring Wilson to accept, in writing, the application. Thereupon they reported to the defendant, exhibited the writing, and demanded their commission, which was refused. Wilson was financially able and otherwise competent to enter into the contract, but withdrew his acceptance and refused to make the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Crasto v. WhiteNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- Gatling v. Central Spar VereinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
3Cited by6 opinions
- Duckworth v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Weiner v. InfeldAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1921
- Holliday v. Roxbury Distilling Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Crescenzo v. Roma Homes, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1958
- Eichenbaum v. Taxicab Independent Owners Auto Mutual Casualty Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.