Legal Opinion

Crescenzo v. Roma Homes, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 17, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The verified complaint was insufficient in that there was a failure to allege on the part of defendant a refusal to accept the commitments for the mortgage loans in question, or to allege any facts showing that the failure to consummate the contemplated loan transactions resulted from the fault or miscarriage of defendant. (Crasto v. White, 52 Hun 473; Ash-field v. Case, 93 App. Div. 452; Duckworth v. Rogers, 109 App. Div. 168.)

The complaint was defective on its face also for failure to allege therein that plaintiff was a duly licensed realty broker on the date when the alleged cause of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crasto v. WhiteNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Ashfield v. CaseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  3. Duckworth v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  4. Spencer v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  5. Cooper v. Realty Appraisers, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Strout Realty v. PhillipsonNew York Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API