Legal Opinion

Eichenbaum v. Taxicab Independent Owners Auto Mutual Casualty Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided March 10, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

Plaintiffs ask that the judgment dismissing their complaint on the merits (Eichenbaum v. Independent Owners Auto Mutual Casualty Co., 135 Misc. 339) be set aside, and instead that a verdict be directed for them, upon the ground that the court erred in its application of the law to the case.

The law as to brokers’ commissions, plaintiffs contend, is radically different, when applied to a mortgage loan, from that to be applied to the sale of real property. In the latter instance the broker has earned his commissions when he has found a purchaser ready, willing and able to buy on the terms set by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crasto v. WhiteNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Gatling v. Central Spar VereinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  3. Ashfield v. CaseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  4. Eichenbaum v. Taxicab Independent Owners Auto Mutual Casualty Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Weniger v. Union Center Plaza AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API