Holliday v. Roxbury Distilling Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, The Roxbury Distilling Company, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 27th day of January, 1909, denying the defendant’s motion to vacate a warrant of attachment.
1Opinion of the Court
Laughlin, J.:
This is an action to recover commissions alleged to have been earned by the plaintiff’s assignor, one Proctor, in procuring a loan of $400,000 for the defendant. The loan was not consummated, but the plaintiff claims that his assignor procured a party ready, able and willing to make the loan upon the terms upon which he was authorized to procure it and that it was not made owing to misrepresentations on the part of defendant with respect to the security to be furnished therefor. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant was to secure the loan “ by a stock of good, pure whisky in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Crasto v. WhiteNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- Ashfield v. CaseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
3Cited by3 opinions
- Birnbaum v. UngerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1912
- Pellaton v. BrunskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Sugarman v. KearnsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1914