Legal Opinion

Negri v. Koning & Associates

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 2013No. H037804PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PREMO, J.

California law provides that, absent an exemption, an employee must be paid time and a half for work in excess of 40 hours per week. To be exempt from that requirement the employee must perform specified duties in a particular manner and be paid “a monthly salary equivalent to no less than two times the state minimum wage for full-time employment.” (Lab. Code, § 515, subd. (a).)

The question presented in this case is whether a compensation scheme based solely upon the number of hours worked, with no guaranteed minimum, can be considered a “salary” within the meaning of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Ramirez v. Yosemite Water CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Roe-Midgett v. CC Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. Terry J. Kennedy v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ming-Hsiang Kao v. Joy Holiday, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. Rhea v. General AtomicsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Cooper v. Gallegos CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Kao v. Joy HolidayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. Russell v. Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API