Negri v. Koning & Associates
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PREMO, J.
California law provides that, absent an exemption, an employee must be paid time and a half for work in excess of 40 hours per week. To be exempt from that requirement the employee must perform specified duties in a particular manner and be paid “a monthly salary equivalent to no less than two times the state minimum wage for full-time employment.” (Lab. Code, § 515, subd. (a).)
The question presented in this case is whether a compensation scheme based solely upon the number of hours worked, with no guaranteed minimum, can be considered a “salary” within the meaning of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Ramirez v. Yosemite Water CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Roe-Midgett v. CC Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Terry J. Kennedy v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ming-Hsiang Kao v. Joy Holiday, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Rhea v. General AtomicsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Cooper v. Gallegos CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Kao v. Joy HolidayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Russell v. Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.