Legal Opinion

Rhea v. General Atomics

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 21, 2014No. D064517PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

IRION, J.

This appeal presents a challenge to General Atomics’s employment practice of requiring exempt employees to use their annual leave hours when they are absent from work for portions of a day. Although Conley v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (2005) 131 Cal.App.4th 260, 263 [31 Cal.Rptr.3d 719] (Conley) established that California law does not prohibit an employer “from following the established federal policy permitting employers to deduct from exempt employees’ vacation leave, when available, on account of partial-day absences,” appellant Lori Rhea contends that Conley was wrongly…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Massachusetts v. MorashSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Ramirez v. Yosemite Water CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Lynn Martin, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  5. Suastez v. Plastic Dress-Up Co.California Supreme Court · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ming-Hsiang Kao v. Joy Holiday, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. Kao v. Joy HolidayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API