Rhea v. General Atomics
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
IRION, J.
This appeal presents a challenge to General Atomics’s employment practice of requiring exempt employees to use their annual leave hours when they are absent from work for portions of a day. Although Conley v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (2005) 131 Cal.App.4th 260, 263 [31 Cal.Rptr.3d 719] (Conley) established that California law does not prohibit an employer “from following the established federal policy permitting employers to deduct from exempt employees’ vacation leave, when available, on account of partial-day absences,” appellant Lori Rhea contends that Conley was wrongly…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Massachusetts v. MorashSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Ramirez v. Yosemite Water CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Lynn Martin, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Suastez v. Plastic Dress-Up Co.California Supreme Court · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ming-Hsiang Kao v. Joy Holiday, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Kao v. Joy HolidayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017