Legal Opinion
State v. Farrar
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 22, 1986No. 3245; 3253PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
In these combined appeals, the defendants appeal from the judgments of conviction. Both defendants were convicted of attempted sexual assault in the first degree, in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49 (a) and 53a-70 (a), and robbery in the first degree, in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (3). The defendant Thomas Farrar was also convicted of carrying a dangerous weapon, in violation of General Statutes § 53-206 (a). Each defendant raises five identical claims of error, the most serious of which is that the trial court committed reversible error by instructing the jury that…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. StepneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. KurvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. LeecanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. VitaleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State v. WhelanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Bunkley v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. HuffordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. FlynnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.