Legal Opinion

Scotten v. Randolph

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1883No. 10,522PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

This was a suit by the appellee, as endorsee, against the appellant, as the maker, of 'a promissory note payable to order, in a bank in this State. In his complaint, the appellee alleged, among other things, that before the maturity of the note he purchased the same, in good- faith, of the payee thereof, paying therefor a valuable consideration, and that the note and the interest thereon were due and unpaid. The cause was put at issue and tried by a jury, and a special verdict was returned, in substance, as follows:

“ 1st. We, the jury, find that the note sued upon was executed by John J.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Berlin v. OglesbeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. School Town of Princeton v. GebhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Zook v. SimonsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Murphy v. LucasIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Maxwell v. BrooksIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Giberson v. JolleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Dudley v. PiggIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Palmer v. PoorIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. McCaslin v. State ex rel. AuditorIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Bunting v. MickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API