Legal Opinion
Bunting v. Mick
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 11, 1892No. 500PublishedCited by 14 opinions
From the Marion Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, J.
Action by the appellee against the appellant on an instrument of writing which reads as follows:
“Indianapolis, Ind., Dec. 22, 1888.
“April first, eighteen hundred and eighty-nine (1889), for value received, pay to E. J. Hodgson, or order, four hundred dollars ($400), with 8 interest after maturity until paid. Payable at Exchange Bank, Bluffton, Ind.
“ G. W. Bunting.”
It was averred in the complaint that this was a promissory note negotiable by the law merchant, and as such it was treated by the court. It was further averred “ that before maturity of said note said Hodgson sold and assigned the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Giberson v. JolleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Schmueckle v. WatersIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Quick v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- City of Logansport v. LaRoseIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Krug v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Johnson v. HarrisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- State National Bank of Springfield v. BennettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Pope v. Branch County Savings BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- Midland Steel Co. v. Citizens National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
- Smith v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.