Legal Opinion
In Re Alameda County Bar Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 11, 1917No. Civ. No. 2181PublishedCited by 4 opinions
PROCEEDING for the disbarment of an attorney at law. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is a proceeding for the disbarment of E. Huffaker, an attorney at law, upon the application of the Alameda Bar Association.
The charge upon which the accusation is founded recites that the accused, while acting as attorney for one John Gray, was guilty of unprofessional conduct involving moral turpitude and dishonesty. The facts as alleged in the accusation may be stated in substance as follows:
The accused was employed by Gray as an attorney to represent him in certain litigation in which Gray was involved, and that during the course of the employment Gray deeded to the accused…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re HaymondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- In re Disbarment of StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Bar Association of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- In Re MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- In Re CruickshankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Bar Ass'n of S.F. v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921