Legal Opinion

Sparks v. Purser

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 31, 1962No. 239PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

Both the plaintiff and the defendant James R. Purser appealed. The defendant assigns as error the refusal of the court to grant his motion for nonsuit at the close of all the evidence. The plain tiff assigns as error the refusal of the court to set aside the verdict out the third issue for that the jury having found the parties entered! into a contract which the defendant breached, the court as a matter of law should have answered the third issue $1,825.00.

The evidence disclosed that originally the defendants and the Senns had some negotiations looking toward the sale of the Queen’s Road…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Raleigh Real Estate & Trust Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. McCoy v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. White v. . PleasantsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Bolich-Hall Realty & Insurance v. DisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Cromartie v. ColbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thompson-McLean, Inc. v. CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Peeler Insurance & Realty, Inc. v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Aiken v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Southland Associates Realtors, Inc. v. MinerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Hecht Realty, Inc. v. WhisnantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API