Hecht Realty, Inc. v. Whisnant
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ERWIN, Judge.
Defendants’ first assignment of error presents the following question: “Did the trial court err in denying the appellants’ motion for a directed verdict at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence and at the conclusion of all of the evidence, and in denying appellants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial?” Defendants rely on several North Carolina cases in contending that in order for the plaintiff to recover, it must establish (1) a binding contract and (2) performance on its part, and this was not established in the case sub judice. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- S & W Realty & Bonded Commercial Agency, Inc. v. Duckworth & Shelton, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Raleigh Real Estate & Trust Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Lindsey v. . SpeightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- American Trust Co. v. GoodeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beckham v. KleinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Burge v. First Southern Savings BankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Gunn v. Lab. Corp. of Am.North Carolina Business Court · 2014