Legal Opinion
Peeler Insurance & Realty, Inc. v. Harmon
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided November 28, 1973No. 7327SC640PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Did the court err in allowing defendant’s motion for directed verdict and dismissing the action? We hold that it did.
Brokerage contracts can be classified both as to type of listing and method of payment to the broker. The former category may be subdivided into two groupings: those in which the listing is exclusive and those in which the listing is nonexclusive. Likewise the latter category may be subdivided into two groupings: those in which the broker is to receive a percentage of the purchase price and those in which the broker is to receive everything he can get over a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- S & W Realty & Bonded Commercial Agency, Inc. v. Duckworth & Shelton, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Deboer v. GeibMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Rubin v. BevilleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- Sparks v. PurserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Aiken v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Foltz v. BegnocheSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- Holiday Homes of St. John, Inc. v. LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- George E. Shepard, Jr., Inc. v. Kim, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Beasley-Kelso Associates, Inc. v. TenneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Joel T. Cheatham, Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.