Legal Opinion

Cantara v. Peeler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1999No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the motions of George Bello, Paul J. James and Paul O’Rourke (defendants) seeking dismissal of the complaint against them for lack of personal jurisdiction. Defendants are Canadian citizens who were involved in a multi-vehicle accident on Route 190 in Erie County. Defendants were properly served by mail pursuant to section 253 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (see, Martin v Mieth, 35 NY2d 414, 415-416; Gay v Laurent, 179 AD2d 411; see also, Sadek v Stewart, 38 AD2d 655). Jurisdiction was acquired upon the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Martin v. MiethNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Low v. WerkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Sadek v. StewartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  4. Philip v. Monarch Knitting Machinery Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Albrecht v. GordonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sardanis v. Sumitomo Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Fernandez v. Univan LeasingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. New York State Thruway Authority v. FenechNew York Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Peeler v. WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Tara Menon v. Water Splash, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API