Legal Opinion

Philip v. Monarch Knitting Machinery Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 29, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Carol E. Huff, J.), entered on July 18, 1990, which denied defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (8) to dismiss the complaint as against defendant Fukahara Industrial & Trading Company, Ltd., a Japanese corporation, for lack of personal jurisdiction and granted plaintiff’s cross motion to compel disclosure, is unanimously affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Plaintiff Morris Philip, an inventor with a world-wide reputation in the knitting industry, brought this action in New York State for specific performance and monetary damages arising…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rissew v. Yamaha Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Low v. WerkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Kahn v. RodmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Blessin v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sardanis v. Sumitomo Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Cantara v. PeelerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Zwerling v. ZwerlingNew York Supreme Court · 1995
  4. MOPS Medical Supply v. GEICO InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API