Legal Opinion

Nichols v. City of Mitchell

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided November 9, 2012No. CIV 11-4016PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

LAWRENCE L. PIERSOL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs James R. Nichols, John F. Robertson and Curtis Dumas brought separate actions against Defendant City of Mitchell claiming employment discrimination in violation of the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA).1 The cases were then consolidated for discovery and trial. The Defendant City of Mitchell moved for summary judgment. Doc. 42. After the motion for summary judgment was filed, the Court allowed Defendant to amend its answers, allowed additional discovery and allowed supplemental…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  5. Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Geter v. Government Printing OfficeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API