Wagner v. Peterson

LEVINE, Justice.

In this appeal from an order denying a new trial, Jack Wagner contends that the jury verdict was not supported by the evidence. We hold that the jury’s verdict was supported by sufficient evidence, and affirm the order of the district court on this issue pursuant to Rule 35.1(a)(3), North Dakota Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Wagner also argues that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding certain testimony of the investigating police officer. Because we are unable to properly review the issue of the excluded testimony, we affirm the order of the trial court.

This…