Legal Opinion
Cargill, Inc. v. Kavanaugh
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 4, 1975No. Civ. 9069PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAND, Judge.
Plaintiff Cargill appeals from a judgment in its favor on the basis that such judgment is insufficient because improperly predicated, and from the trial court’s denial of its motion for modification of judgment.
The parties are in agreement on the following facts: That
On October 20,1972, the appellant Car-gill entered into a written contract to buy 7,500 bushels of # 1 hard amber durum wheat from the appellee Patrick J. Kava-naugh, a farmer.
The terms of that written contract provided that Kavanaugh was to deliver said wheat to Cargill at its Lakota, North Dakota, elevator between…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- In Re Estate of ElmerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
- Farmers Union Grain Terminal Ass'n v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Nee v. Linwood Securities Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
- Hefty v. AldrichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- BTA Oil Producers v. MDU Resources Group, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Farmers Elevator Company v. DavidNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Jn Exploration & Production v. Western Gas Resources, Inc., Jn Exploration & Production v. Western Gas Resources, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Mills v. Agrichemical Aviation, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Lohse v. Atlantic Richfield Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.