Legal Opinion
Edward Vanasco v. Securities and Exchange Commission
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 31, 1968No. 31617_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATERMAN, Circuit Judge:
Petitioner has asked us to review, pursuant to Section 25(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78y (a), an order of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) barring him from association with any broker or dealer. This severe penalty was imposed upon petitioner by the Commission after the Commission found that petitioner had wilfully violated, or had aided and abetted the wilful violation of, the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws 1 in the offer and sale of the common stock of Puritan Chemical Corporation (Puritan). Because we…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Dinion Coil Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- National Labor Relations Board v. Marcus Trucking Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Irwin Berko v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Standard Distributors, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Robert F. Haltmier v. Commodity Futures Trading CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Sokoloff v. SaxbeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,455 Robert W. Nees v. Securities and Exchange Commission, William Reigel v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Stanley GROSS, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Whitney v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.