Legal Opinion

Solvent Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Walker

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1913PublishedCited by 9 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Error to Chancery Court, Shelby County. — Francis Fentress, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Neil

The case before us was brought to this court for review, whereas, under Acts of 1907, ch. 82, it should have been carried to the court of civil appeals. By chapter 192 Acts of 1909, it is provided that, when cases are appealed to this court which rightly belong, to the court of civil appeals, it shall be our duty to transfer such cases to that court, and vice versa. But the present case was brought here by writ of error. In view of this fact it is now denied by counsel for defendant that we can make the transfer required by the act of 1909, because, as insisted, that act applies only to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Southern v. Beeler, Atty.-Gen.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Coleman v. ColemanTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Roberts v. Cahill Forge & Foundry Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Chickamauga Quarry & Construction Co. v. PundtTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Trotter and Arnold v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API