Legal Opinion

Trotter and Arnold v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Green

The plaintiffs in error have been convicted of conspiring to take and appropriate to their own benefit, by the use of false pretenses, certain public funds of Hamilton County. They were each sentenced to a term of three years in the penitentiary and have appealed in error to this court.

Trotter was the Chairman of the Hamilton County Board of Education and Arnold was a contractor engaged to erect a county school and to do other work for said county. The indictment charges that these two “did unlawfully and feloniously agree, confederate and conspire together to feloniously take and appropriate…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  3. Rogers v. ColvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Riggins v. TylerTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kerney v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  2. White v. KaneTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Asbury v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
  4. State Ex Rel. Allen v. BeasleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Presley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API