Chickamauga Quarry & Construction Co. v. Pundt
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM HAMILTON. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Hamilton County. —Nathan L. Bachman, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams
This is an action brought by Pundt to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been suffered by him while in the- employ of the construction company.
In the first trial a verdict for- plaintff in the sum of $8,000 was returned by the jury, but set aside by the court. The plaintiff preserved a wayside bill of exceptions.
The last trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for $9,000. The defendant company preserved its bill of exceptions, and prayed an appeal.
The plaintiff did not appeal, but has filed the record for a writ of error for the purpose of having reviewed' and reversed the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Barnes v. NoelTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
- Chesapeake, Ohio & Southwestern Railroad v. HigginsTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
- Solvent Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. WalkerTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jones v. Eastern Michigan MotorbusesMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Howell v. Wallace E. Johnson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956
- Town of Dickson v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1935
- Wm. J. Oliver Mfg. Co. v. SlimpTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
- Griffitts v. Rockford Utility DistrictCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.