Legal Opinion

Woodburn Sarven Wheel Co. v. McKernan

Indiana Superior Court

Decided July 1, 1871PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Newcomb, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

The plaintiff, in her complaint, says that she is the owner in fee simple, and possessed of certain real estate,- and that the defendant unjustly claims title to said premises in fee, wherefore the plaintiff asks that the title may be settled and quieted.

The defendant answered by a general denial. The cause was tried at Special Term, and judgment and decree that title was in the plaintiff. The defendant moved for a new trial, which motion was overruled, and appeal granted' to General Term.

The real estate in question was conveyed on the 21st day of May, 1862, by the defendant, James H.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Glidewell v. SpaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Lewis v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Doe ex dem. Mace v. DuttonIndiana Supreme Court · 1850
  4. King's Administrator v. KellyIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Sherry v. Nick of WoodsIndiana Supreme Court · 1850

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Frost v. CloutmanSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1834
  3. Mandeville v. MackenzieDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1801
  4. Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API