Legal Opinion

Sparf v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 21, 1895No. 613PublishedCited by 2 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court 1

156 U.S. 51 (1895)

SPARF AND HANSEN

v.

UNITED STATES.

No. 613.

Supreme Court of United States.

Submitted March 5, 1894.

Decided January 21, 1895.

THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

Mr. J.F. Smith and Mr. F.J. Kierce for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Assistant Attorney General Conrad for defendants in error.

2Opinion of the Court · HarlanJustice Harlan

The plaintiffs in error and Thomas St. Clair were indicted jointly for the murder of Maurice Fitzgerald upon the high seas, on board of an American vessel, the bark Hesper, as set forth in the indictment mentioned in St. Clair v. United States, 154 U.S. 134. On…

Also in this document: Dissent · Brewer; Dissent · Gray.

3Cases cited81 opinions

  1. Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Ex Parte YarbroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Mutual Life Insurance v. HillmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rudner v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. United States v. Daniel BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API