Doe ex dem. Mace v. Dutton
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Tippecanoe Court of Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.
Ejectment. Judgment below for the defendant.
The plaintiff claimed title to the lands in question in his lessor, Daniel Mace, by virtue of a judgment, sheriff’s sale, and deed. Said Mace was the attorney of Browning and Co., the plaintiffs in the judgment. Burditt and Calvert were the defendants in said judgment. Dutton, the grantee of Calvert, one of those defendants, was the defendant in this ejectment, and he resisted the plaintiff’s claim of title, on the ground that said sheriff’s sale and deed were void; and, to establish that proposition, he *310relied upon two assumptions claimed by him to…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. MatherNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- Green v. BurkeNew York Supreme Court · 1840
- Miller v. AshtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1844
- Hoskins v. HelmCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1823
- Buckley v. Port Henry Iron Ore Co.New York Supreme Court · 1888
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lindley v. KelleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Bank of Douglas v. NeelArizona Supreme Court · 1926
- Martindale v. PalmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Richey v. MerrittIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Sowle v. ChampionIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.