Sparf v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Concurrence
Mr. Justice Gray,
with whom concurred
2DissentJustice Shiras
Mr. Justice Shiras and myself concur in so much of the opinion of the majority of the court as awards a new trial to one of the defendants, by reason of the admission in evidence against him of confessions made in his absence by the other.
But from the greater part of that opinion, and from the affirmance of the conviction of the other defendant, we are compelled to dissent, because, in our judgment, the case, involving the question of life or death to the prisoners, was not submitted to the decision of the jury as required by the Constitution and laws of…
3Cases cited46 opinions
- Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Ex Parte YarbroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Wisconsin v. Pelican InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Starr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.