United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. City of Pittsburg
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dawson, J.:
This action was one of the consequences of the failure of a contractor to construct a sewer in Pittsburg. The plaintiff bonding company had guaranteed performance, and on the default of the contractor after he had completed most of the work and had been proportionately paid therefor, plaintiff finished the job, and sued the city for $1,500 paid to a bank on an order and assignment by the contractor and accepted by the city before the contractor’s default, but not actually paid until such default. The bonding company claimed that the city…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hall v. Kansas City Terra Cotta Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. City of StaffordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Middleton v. City of EmporiaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Barlow v. LandeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- McCubbin v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. First State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- National Surety Corporation v. FisherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Brown-Crummer Investment Co. v. City of Arkansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- Everett v. City of Arkansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1925