Legal Opinion

Everett v. City of Arkansas City

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1925No. 25,670PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

The action was one to recover interest on a delayed payment for the construction of a sewer. A motion for judgment on the pleadings was sustained, and plaintiff appeals.

The interest in question covers a period from January 23, 1922, the date the sewer was completed and accepted by the city, to October 4, 1922, the date when settlement was made of the principal amount ($116,232).

The defendant city contends it was prevented from making settlement, during a part of the delinquent period, by a mandamus action filed against it in this court by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. City of PittsburgSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. L. R. Foy Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  2. Brown-Crummer Investment Co. v. City of Arkansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  3. United States v. L. R. Foy Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API