Legal Opinion

Brown-Crummer Investment Co. v. City of Arkansas City

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 7, 1928No. 28,019PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

The Brown-Crummer Investment Company sued Arkansas City to recover $18,878.51, as damages for its failure to deliver certain bonds of the city in compliance with an alleged agreement. The cause was submitted on pleadings, opening state*770ments and admissions made in open court. It was adjudged by the court that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover on its claim, and gave judgment against it for the costs of the action. Plaintiff appeals. /

The record discloses that Arkansas City created a sewer district designated as sewer district…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. City of Arkansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  2. De Sollar v. HanscomeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Stroup v. PepperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. Daily ex rel. Daily v. MinnickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. Gould v. GunnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marsh v. Brown-Crummer Investment Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  2. Shelley v. Sentinel Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Maxine Devlin Moore v. John C. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  4. Jayhawk Racing Props., LLC v. City of TopekaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2018
  5. Jayhawk Racing Properties v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API