Legal Opinion
Minneapolis Holding Co. v. Matchan
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 11, 1928No. 26,915PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
The principal purpose of this action was to annul for want of jurisdiction certain judgments which, so long as they stand, are a bar to plaintiff’s claim of title to the real estate involved in Matchan v. Phoenix Land Inv. Co. 159 Minn. 132, 198 N. W. 417. A related case is Betcher v. Midland Nat. Bank, 167 Minn. 484, 209 N. W. 325.
The answers, if true, show that plaintiff’s claim is utterly baseless. The replies did not meet by denial or avoidance the allegations of the answers which are fatal to plaintiff’s alleged cause of action. In consequence, the replies were stricken as sham and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matchan v. Phoenix Land Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Callaghan v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Betcher v. Midland National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Bardwell-Robinson Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Investors Security Co. v. BohanonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nielsen v. BralandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Perkins v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Gilson v. KnoufSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928